latest

Re: Interesting NNTP discussion (thread) rocksolid.shared.linux Posted: 2 Days 2 Hours ago by: Anonymous I guess mastodon was created to support one side of discussion maybe? From this site https://michcioperz.com/post/fediverse/ the creator of Mastodon expressed his intent to build a network that’s safe from Nazis and GamerGaters and
Re: Interesting NNTP discussion (thread) rocksolid.shared.linux Posted: 2 Days 3 Hours ago by: Anonymous Here's mastodon proving their fediverse supports free discussion --- Mastodon is completely opposed to Gab’s project and philosophy, which seeks to monetize and platform racist content while hiding behind the banner of free speech. Ma
Re: Interesting NNTP discussion (thread) rocksolid.shared.linux Posted: 2 Days 7 Hours ago by: Anonymous I think they do today.
Re: Interesting NNTP discussion (thread) rocksolid.shared.linux Posted: 2 Days 7 Hours ago by: Miner The tragedy is most peoples are happy to use an insecure solutions, which break their privacy and even able to cause a leak of sensetive data. I'm sure they once will pay for stupid carelessness.
Re: Interesting NNTP discussion (thread) rocksolid.shared.linux Posted: 2 Days 8 Hours ago by: Miner We don't have to listen to their opinion. In russian segment of I2P a striking example of this is the case of "hata.i2p" eepsite. This resource was maintained by russian hackers, until some amateur found a vulnerability there. Discoura
Re: Interesting NNTP discussion (thread) rocksolid.shared.linux Posted: 2 Days 9 Hours ago by: Anonymous I think most people now assume they don't have privacy and don't seem to care about that. The amount of people that choose privacy is getting smaller, and people are criticized that they must be hiding something. Kind of turns people a
Re: Interesting NNTP discussion (thread) rocksolid.shared.linux Posted: 2 Days 9 Hours ago by: Anonymous These groups are shared via NNTP. The web interface is just that, an interface to the groups. I agree. Less people are willing to work with older tech, or don't even know about it, so the communities are small. But the quality of comm
Re: Interesting NNTP discussion (thread) rocksolid.shared.linux Posted: 2 Days 10 Hours ago by: Miner New stuff breaks privacy. Most peoples don't realize this or do not care about privacy due to own ignorance. The world that is enclosed in the browser can collapse with the browser. This will be the price of the choice they are made. Ag
Re: Interesting NNTP discussion (thread) rocksolid.shared.linux Posted: 2 Days 15 Hours ago by: Anonymous You mean like we do here on this board ? But yeah, I agree with you, old does not mean it's not good any more. Not automatically, anyway... It could mean that you get a lot less support from the community in case of problems, because the
Re: Interesting NNTP discussion (thread) rocksolid.shared.linux Posted: 3 Days 2 Hours ago by: Anonymous Just because something is old doesn't mean it's bad. The main issue with some of the older protocols are the lack of encryption, but that doesn't mean it can't be added. There's a small crowd that likes gopher, but the main problem is the l

Re: Interesting NNTP discussion (thread)

rocksolid.shared.linux

Posted: 2 Days 2 Hours ago by: Anonymous

I guess mastodon was created to support one side of discussion maybe? From this site https://michcioperz.com/post/fediverse/ the creator of Mastodon expressed his intent to build a network that’s safe from Nazis and GamerGaters and

Re: Interesting NNTP discussion (thread)

rocksolid.shared.linux

Posted: 2 Days 3 Hours ago by: Anonymous

Here's mastodon proving their fediverse supports free discussion --- Mastodon is completely opposed to Gab’s project and philosophy, which seeks to monetize and platform racist content while hiding behind the banner of free speech. Ma

Re: Interesting NNTP discussion (thread)

rocksolid.shared.linux

Posted: 2 Days 7 Hours ago by: Anonymous

I think they do today.

Re: Interesting NNTP discussion (thread)

rocksolid.shared.linux

Posted: 2 Days 7 Hours ago by: Miner

The tragedy is most peoples are happy to use an insecure solutions, which break their privacy and even able to cause a leak of sensetive data. I'm sure they once will pay for stupid carelessness.

Re: Interesting NNTP discussion (thread)

rocksolid.shared.linux

Posted: 2 Days 8 Hours ago by: Miner

We don't have to listen to their opinion. In russian segment of I2P a striking example of this is the case of "hata.i2p" eepsite. This resource was maintained by russian hackers, until some amateur found a vulnerability there. Discoura

Re: Interesting NNTP discussion (thread)

rocksolid.shared.linux

Posted: 2 Days 9 Hours ago by: Anonymous

I think most people now assume they don't have privacy and don't seem to care about that. The amount of people that choose privacy is getting smaller, and people are criticized that they must be hiding something. Kind of turns people a

Re: Interesting NNTP discussion (thread)

rocksolid.shared.linux

Posted: 2 Days 9 Hours ago by: Anonymous

These groups are shared via NNTP. The web interface is just that, an interface to the groups. I agree. Less people are willing to work with older tech, or don't even know about it, so the communities are small. But the quality of comm

Re: Interesting NNTP discussion (thread)

rocksolid.shared.linux

Posted: 2 Days 10 Hours ago by: Miner

New stuff breaks privacy. Most peoples don't realize this or do not care about privacy due to own ignorance. The world that is enclosed in the browser can collapse with the browser. This will be the price of the choice they are made. Ag

Re: Interesting NNTP discussion (thread)

rocksolid.shared.linux

Posted: 2 Days 15 Hours ago by: Anonymous

You mean like we do here on this board ? But yeah, I agree with you, old does not mean it's not good any more. Not automatically, anyway... It could mean that you get a lot less support from the community in case of problems, because the

Re: Interesting NNTP discussion (thread)

rocksolid.shared.linux

Posted: 3 Days 2 Hours ago by: Anonymous

Just because something is old doesn't mean it's bad. The main issue with some of the older protocols are the lack of encryption, but that doesn't mean it can't be added. There's a small crowd that likes gopher, but the main problem is the l

10 recent articles found.

rocksolid light 0.7.2
clearnet i2p tor